Finance UpdatesFinance Updates
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Education
What's Hot

Sen. Dianne Feinstein Cause of death? By age of 90

October 1, 2023

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Price in Pakistan 2023 & Specifications

October 1, 2023

Suzuki Swift latest price in Pakistan October 2023 & Specifications

October 1, 2023
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Finance UpdatesFinance Updates
Sunday, October 1
  • Home
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Education
Finance UpdatesFinance Updates
Home » It is not our job to give opinion on Reko Diq deal, CJP Bandial remarks on presidential reference – Financeupdates
Latest

It is not our job to give opinion on Reko Diq deal, CJP Bandial remarks on presidential reference – Financeupdates

Web DeskBy Web DeskOctober 25, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
It is not our job to give opinion on Reko Diq deal, CJP Bandial remarks on presidential reference
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

[ad_1]

Image showing the exterior of the Supreme Court of Pakistans building in Islamabad. — Supreme Court wesite
Image showing the exterior of the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s building in Islamabad. — Supreme Court wesite
  • “The court did not have expertise in financial matters. The questions asked in the reference are very broad, clarify them,” says CJP.
  • CJP Bandial says that the questions asked in the reference are very broad and directs to clarify them.
  • The top court directs the additional attorney general to propose names of judicial assistants in the case and adjourned the hearing.

ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial Tuesday remarked that it was not the job of the apex court to give an opinion on agreements like the Reko Diq deal.

CJP Bandial issued the remarks during the hearing of a presidential reference seeking the top court’s opinion on the Reko Diq settlement agreement.

During the course of the proceedings, CJP Bandial said that the Reko Diq agreement would have been signed under different conditions if Pakistan had resources.

“The court did not have expertise in financial matters. The questions asked in the reference are very broad, so clarify them,” the CJP ordered.

In response, the Additional Attorney-General Aamir Rehman presented the details of deals and agreements relating to the Reko Diq case.

The Balochistan government signed a Chagai Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement in 1993. In 2,000, the Tethyan Copper Company made an investment of $240 million, he informed the court, adding that in 2006, a petition was filed in the Balochistan High Court against the gold mining agreement. However, it was dismissed.

The Supreme Court declared the Chagai Hills Exploration Joint Venture Agreement “illegal” in 2013. After that, the Tethyan Copper Company approached the international court in light of the Supreme Court’s decision.

After this, the international courts imposed a fine on Pakistan which is over $9 billion, said Rehman.

“Why is Barrick Gold getting 50% of the share and who actually owns Reko Diq?” questioned Justice Jamaal Khan Mandokhel.

At this, the attorney-general said that Balochistan was getting 25% of the share while the federal government is paying for it. He said that the Reko Diq agreement will make a profit of $104 billion and the federal and Balochistan governments will get a 62% profit from the deal.

Aamir said that the Tethyan Copper Company needs assurance for a big investment, and in case the court does not allow it, Pakistan will have to give $9 billion.

“Where will Pakistan pay $9 billion from?” questioned Justice Ijazul Ahsan. At this, Aamir said that there will be no international investments in Pakistan if the country has to pay $9 billion.

At this, CJP Bandial said that the court’s verdict cannot be examined again.

Justice Mandokhel, on the other hand, said if the minerals of Balochistan are utilised properly, they are enough for the entire country. “The old agreement pertaining to Reko Diq was struck in a very irresponsible manner.”

Meanwhile, the court directed the additional attorney general to propose names of judicial assistants in the case and adjourned the hearing.

[ad_2]

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleRupee strengthens, closes below 220 against dollar – Financeupdates
Next Article Gold price once again surpasses Rs148,000 threshold as demand picks up pace – Financeupdates
Web Desk
  • Website

Related Posts

Common Types of Domain Threats and How to Mitigate Them

September 28, 2023

BISE Bahawalpur board announces Inter Part 2 result 2023!

September 13, 2023

BISE Gujranwala board announces Inter Part 2 result 2023!

September 13, 2023
Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Latest News
  • Sen. Dianne Feinstein Cause of death? By age of 90
  • Xiaomi 13 Ultra Price in Pakistan 2023 & Specifications
  • Suzuki Swift latest price in Pakistan October 2023 & Specifications
  • US Dollar Value Declines Against Pakistani Rupee
  • FBR significantly exceeded its Revenue Collection objective by Rs. 63 billion
Advertisment
SECTIONS
  • Mobile
  • Trending
Latest Post
  • Sen. Dianne Feinstein Cause of death? By age of 90
  • Xiaomi 13 Ultra Price in Pakistan 2023 & Specifications
  • Suzuki Swift latest price in Pakistan October 2023 & Specifications
Trending
  • Petrol Price in Pakistan
  • Prize bond Schedule
  • Gold Rate in Pakistan
  • USD TO PKR

Finance Updates. Pakistan's Leading resource of Business & Technology News, we cover news in sci-tech, business, sports, auto, education, and trending.

Our Email: contact@financeupdates.net

Facebook Twitter
© 2023 Financeupdates.
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Advertisement

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.